An effective <u>public defender system</u> should be funded in the same way other organs of government are funded - via taxes.
<h3>What is a public defender system?</h3>
In the United States, the public defender system is a system of attorneys-at-law appointed by the courts to defend, represent and advise those who are unable to afford to hire a private lawyer or attorney.
The public defenders are usually appointed or provided by the state or federal government. Their job function stems from the fact that every developed society must maintain a justice system that is founded on equity and justice to remain functional.
This is a justification for why taxes should be appropriated to fund the system. They may also be funded from fines paid by individuals or corporations who err against the state.
See the link below for more about public defenders:
brainly.com/question/14649908
Answer: 6 Mar 2018 — Flappers of the 1920s were young women known for their energetic freedom, embracing a lifestyle viewed by many at the time as outrageous, immoral or downright dangerous. Now considered the first generation of independent American women, flappers pushed barriers in economic, political and sexual freedom for women.
Explanation:
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
It was a significant development because it the first set of rules that anyone could see at any time so there was no excuse like oh whoops i didn't know! hope i helped
Answer: True.
Explanation:
More intensive contacts between China and Europe took place at the beginning of the 16th century. At that time, China was at the peak of economic development, and the ideas of humanism and the Renaissance were spreading widely in Europe. So the contacts intensified in favorable conditions for both. Both benefited because there was a trade exchange between the two entities to talk about economic benefits in this case. The mutual contact between the two civilizations also led to exchanging ideas and acquaintance with other cultures.
