Answer:
These legal restrictions reflected nativist claims that:
the Chinese posed multiple threats. They came as servile “coolie” laborers who would take away the livelihood and destroy the dignity of white workingmen. They lived “huddled together…almost like rats” in pestilential ghettos, “Chinatowns” that endangered the health and welfare of the larger white community. Behind the apparently placid demeanor of these Orientals lurked the sexually demonic. The “Chinamen” not only drove their own women into prostitution but also sought to debauch vulnerable white women—or so it seemed in the sexual fantasy of their foes.”
Explanation:
Answer:
Distrust between the two countries grew.
Explanation:
Soviet-US relations were based on a complicated interplay of cultural, political, and economic factors that led to bitter superpower rivalry. The Soviet's reluctance to the Americans was because the U.S refused to recognize the USSR as a legitimate recognition at the international stage, as well as their late participation in the war that culminated in the deaths of millions of Russians. Americans had been suspicious of the communist ideology of the Soviet Union and worried about the impact of tyrannical rule in Soviet Russia over their own nation.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
Answer: Short-run changes in the growth of GDP contracts, between recessionsat the end of a recession two consecutive quarters of negative growth in real GDP positively correlated and negatively correlated
Explanation:
Explanation:
We supposed to right it out or an a,b,c,d question
.
