Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
Answer:
to persuade
Explanation:
uses words like I beleve and I think to get you to think what they are thinking.
Depends on the person who is teaching and if it is a 21 word thingy or it may be a paragraph.