The principle that best shows why the conclusion by the researcher is not justified is the alternative explanations principle.
<h3>What is the alternative explanations principle?</h3>
This is a principle in research that posits that a researcher cannot conclude that a phenomenon is caused by something when other things could have been the cause.
In this case, the researcher concluded that having two cars caused people to have bigger garages when it could simply be that they wanted a bigger garage for storage.
Find out more on alternative explanations at brainly.com/question/8946311.
#SPJ12
Answer:
A states' right or power cannot exceed that of the federal government. In other words, a state cannot impose a law that is in violation of a federal law. An extreme example would be a woman's right to vote. All free female citizens have a right to vote
Explanation:
Answer:
c. abolish that government
Answer:
As <em>TAoW</em> also points out, <em>knowing ourselves is good but knowing only ourselves and not the enemy will cause a defeat for every victory we obtain</em>; thereby a great foundation to ensure victories and our own security would be <em>to know both the enemy and ourselves</em>; an important thing would be to have a reliable way to store our data and information, which basically starts by thinking in the way our potential enemy would, thus we could counter such enemy's attack avoiding the data being compromised, so the set up of <em>austere standards and guidelines</em> regarding the data management approach within the organization is crucial, including all members of the team in awareness of such standards and the potential threats so they can be prepared and know what to do in each case due it would be embedded in their mindset and general culture of the whole team.
