1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena-2011 [213]
3 years ago
10

How did reformers reconcile their desire to create moral order with their quest to enhance personal freedom? they claimed that g

enuine liberty meant allowing others to eliminate those problems that might threaten that liberty. they stressed liberation from external restraints, like slavery, and internal servitude, such as drinking alcohol. they contended that self-discipline was so rare that someone had to step in and make sure americans could enjoy the fruits of their labor. they felt that eliminating temptations would lead to the natural liberty that protestants had long considered crucial to maintaining a good society?
Social Studies
1 answer:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
5 0

The reformers reconciled their desire to create moral order with their quest to enhance personal freedom. This they did by stressing liberation from external restraints, like slavery, and internal servitude, such as drinking alcohol. <span>According to them, a lot of people were "slaves" to various sins and liberating them from this enslavement would enable them to compete economically.</span>

You might be interested in
If you get violently ill after eating a tainted food, you will probably develop an aversion to the taste of that food but not to
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

This best illustrates the importance of "<u>biological predispositions</u>" in associative learning.

Explanation:

Biological predisposition in humans means that there are internal characteristics humans possess that increase their chances of having certain conditions.

The taste aversion (or dislike) someone develops after eating tainted food and falling ill is as a result of <em>associating the stimuli (the taste of the bad food) with the response (falling ill)</em>.

By associating the stimuli with the response, the body learns to stay away from such food in future, to avoid falling ill again.

This indicates that biological predispositions are more important in associative learning than external stimuli (such as; music or the sight of the restaurant).

6 0
3 years ago
What would you conside r to be one of the major issue in an icf/iid facility?
nikdorinn [45]
One of the major issues facing the icf/iid facility is an issue emanating from financial constraints as the facility deals in special needs equipments, which are quite costly.
6 0
3 years ago
PLZZZ HELP ME OUT THIS DUE TODAY AND SO STRESS OUT!!!! SEE 4 OF THESE IMAGES AND THEN ANSWER THEM.PLZZ HURRY!!!ALSO PLZ WHEN ANS
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Those who are so concerned about getting an exact answer for this question fail to realize what you just said. The reason that there isn’t an exact answer is because the language is so fluid and flexible. It’s what makes English such a fun language. If everything was limited to set rules that couldn’t be broken or played with, English would be such a boring language. Be happy that there isn’t an exact answer for how many sentences are there in a paragraph because if there was an exact answer, English would be a lot more boring overall.

What does that mean a three sentence writing

My teacher says that paragraphs have to be 5 or more sentences for my essay in 9th grade. Is this legal?

A teacher can require you do do whatever he/she wants. That doesn’t mean that’s the only way to do it, but you’ll get marked down for not following the instructions correctly. You’d best follow the teacher’s instructions.

I’m surprised people can get so worked up about a topic that doesn’t have an exact answer. If you need to have an exact answer for everything in life, you’re going to have a hard time. The number of sentences will be different for each person. Nobody writes the same way. And if you write one sentence or ten sentences, neither is wrong.

This is exactly what I was thinking. It’s hilarious that people are getting worked up about how many sentences should be in a paragraph. In the scheme of things, this doesn’t even rate a blip on the radar. Write ans many sentences as you want as long as you can justify why you wrote that many to your professor.

I try to write a minimum of five sentences per paragraph. I’m not always able to do that depending on what I’m writing, but I think that’s a good goal especially when you’re writing essays for school work. I think by having a goal you end up writing better, but you need to understand that the goal can be broken in certain circumstances. I’m not sure if that will help anybody who comes across this article, but that’s what I do when it comes to paragraphs.

This is good information to know. My question is, does it really matter how long each sentence is within the paragraph? For example, if I write eight sentences, but each sentence is only three or four words long, do I need to extend the paragraph so that maybe it has 12 to 14 sentences? On the other hand, if I write long sentences such as 10 to 12 words each, can I get away with only four sentences in the paragraph? Does the length of the sentence matter at all or is this something that I shouldn’t be worried about with my writing?

No! You should separate the paragraphs when there is a change of topic, not based on the number of sentences or the sentence length. If you did it like that, the paragraphs would be quite difficult to read and the flow would be terrible.

These our general rules. Don’t focus on them as much his writing well. That’s really what it all comes down to. If you take the time to write well, it’s not going to matter how many sentences are in each paragraph. If you don’t write well, the number of sentences that you have in each paragraph may be an issue along with a lot of other things. Just write the best that you can and you should be okay.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it a. rejected the idea that the Second Amendment applies to state government
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

d. applied the Second Amendment to state governments.

Explanation:

The second amendment was applied by the Supreme Court holding that it was incorporated under the fourteenth amendment as regards the Due Process Clause or Privileges or Immunities Clause , and reversing the Seventh Circuit in this way. This decision by the Supreme Court in June 2010 cleared the uncertainty in the Chicago gun restrictions as well as in other states.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A potlach can best be describe as a
zavuch27 [327]

A Potlach is a ceremonial feast, common with the Northwest Native American tribes, wherein possessions were given away or destroyed by the wealthy tribespeople in a show of their opulence and wealth.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A bigger, yet lighter, tennis racket or golf club that enables an athletes to hit balls with less error and more speed would be
    7·1 answer
  • What was one drawback to the Roman roads?
    11·1 answer
  • What made cultural diffusion in west africa possible
    10·2 answers
  • How did the relationship between the united states and Cuba change during president Obama's time in office
    14·1 answer
  • 5th grade problem. Correct answer will be marked brainliest.
    12·1 answer
  • Which cultural traits are commonly found among the people of Brazil? Choose all answers that are correct. 1. strong family ties
    7·2 answers
  • In 2015, what is the actual pay statistic for American workers according to U.S Census data?
    6·1 answer
  • Looking for grade 10 student <br>Tara let's make a GC ​
    10·1 answer
  • How was it for the native and spanish living together
    14·1 answer
  • The monoamine hypothesis of depression proposes that:.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!