Answer:
The payback period is more than 5 years
Explanation:
Net present value is the Net value of all cash inflows and outflows in present value term. All the cash flows are discounted using a required rate of return.
Year Cash flow PV factor Present Value
0 ($490,000) 1 ($490,000)
1 $40,000 0.909 $36,360
2 $10,000 0.826 $8,260
3 $120,000 0.751 $90,120
4 $90,000 0.683 $61,470
5 $180,000 0.621 <u> $111,780 </u>
Net Present Value ($182,010)
NPV of this Investment is negative so, it is not acceptable.
Payback period
Total Net cash inflow of the investment is $440,000 and Initial investment is $490,000. This investment will take more than 5 years to payback the initial investment.
Solution:
The reporting unit's book value of $250 million meets the market value of $220 million.
Requirement 1:
Determination of implied fair value of goodwill:
Fair value of Center point, Inc. $220 million
Fair value of Center point’s net assets (excluding goodwill) 200 million
Implied fair value of goodwill $ 20 million
Measurement of impairment loss:
Book value of goodwill $62 million
Implied fair value of goodwill 20 million
Impairment loss $42 million
Requirement 2: If the operating unit's market valuation of 270 million dollars surpasses 250 million dollars, there is no depreciation risk.
Answer:
:A) will shift left.
Explanation:
An inferior good is a good whose demand falls when income increases and demand increases when income decreases.
As Vanessas income increases, her demand for ramen noodles would fall. This would lead to a decrease in demand for ramen noodles and her demand curve would shift to the left.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.