Answer:
The current ratio is 1.18 times
Explanation:
Current Ratio: The current ratio is that ratio which shows a relationship between the current assets and the current liabilities
The computation of the current ratio is shown below
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
where,
Total current assets = Cash + short-term investments + net accounts receivable + merchandise inventory
= $43,500 + $27,000 + $102,000 + $125,000
= $297,500
And, the total current liabilities is $251,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $297,500 ÷ $251,000
= 1.18 times
The long term note payable is not a current liabilities,hence it is not considered in the computation part.
Answer: Plainly put, extreme income inequality, such as the kind found in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, cause economic inefficiency. The relatively wealthy tend to save a much higher proportion of their income than the poor. In order to grow economically, a society must have robust rates of consumption. However, if most of the wealth of a country is owned by a very small percentage of its population, that wealth is saved, not spent. These savings are then invested by individuals and financial institutions.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. backward vertical integration
Explanation:
Vertical integration is one in which the supply chain of a clothe producing company is owned by the
Backward integration is a type of vertical integration in which a firms starts to fill in the role it once designated to another in the manufacturing of its product. Backward vertical integration would see a company buying another to fulfill its needs as regarding production.
From the above question, it can be seen that due to the inability of the china firm to meet up with Neon Electronics Inc; it started to produce the touchscreens needed for the tablet computers.
Cheers.
Answer:
Jones is right in this lawsuit
Explanation:
Arbitration is the process by which disputes are settled between parties. When there is a disagreement between parties an arbitrator comes in to give a fair and unbiased view of the situation.
A solution that is agreed to by all parties is agreed upon to settle.
In this scenario where Jones is filing a lawsuit against BigMoney LLC for violating the Securities Exchange Act by engaging in fraudulent excessive trading, this is a violation of the law and not a dispute between parties.
So the arbitration clause is is not binding and the arbitration clause should be nullified.
<span>10%
Simplest way to solve this problem is realizing that if 50% of all foreign students smoke, then that also means that 50% of all foreign students don't smoke (100% - 50% = 50%). So for every smoking foreign student you see, there's a non-smoking foreign student. So just double the number of smoking foreign students to get the total number foreign students. So
5% * 2 = 10%</span>
