Answer:
Eddith Carolina could accept to take on the new cosmetic line, while Michael Sanders may reject same.
Explanation:
Eddith Carolina, been the president of the company, has shown that he's a risk taker. The idea behind this is that he is open to new opportunities that could otherwise improve his holdings and networth. The decision to take on a new cosmetic line is therefore in line with the policy of the President of the company. The implication is that Eddith Carolina is tilted to accepting the proposal.
Michael Sanders, on the other hand, is an ordinary employee. Even though he is the manager of the division, he bears no risk of ownership. And in an event of liquidation or solvency, he simply has no big collateral to part with, unlike the Eddith Carolinas. What individual like Michael Sanders are interested in is the protection of their job and income. Knowing the nature of an employee as conservative and risk averse and the fear of not loosing their paid job, it is therefore not surprising that Michael Sanders could reject the new cosmetic line bid.
I can’t see the questions very well
Answer:
O D. $24.000
Explanation:
Under the straight-line depreciation method, the depreciation amount is a constant figure throughout the life of an asset. It means that every year, the amount charged as depreciation is the same throughout the life of the asset.
For the stone pizza, the depreciation per year is $8000. In three years, the amount of accumulated depreciation will be $8000 multiplied by three years.
=$8000 x 3 years
=$24,000
Answer: Improve Productivity
Explanation: Accurate inventory levels mean staff has what they need to get the job done. Having accurate knowledge of your on-hand inventory provides for an improved and more efficient reordering process.
Answer:
A. Wait for real-world events to confirm or refute the hypothesis.
B. Conduct one or more experiments.
Explanation:
Hypothesis by economists can lead to results that can decide economic policy. As such, it is important that they are tried and tested.
One way of testing a hypothesis is the standard method of conducting one of more experiments. These experiments will simulate world settings so that the experiment can be as close as possible to the real world.
Another method is to experience the hypothesis. The economist could just wait for events in the real world to either confirm or deny the hypothesis because the economy is dynamic and has been known to react uniquely to events that it otherwise should not have reacted to. It is therefore likely that it might react in a certain way that will enable the economist test their hypothesis.
