Answer:
The answer for your question is A) Farmer
°° Let's see -
If Harry wakes up in England at 8:00 in the morning, then Ron is going to bed in California - This is the fun part - Solving for the unknown time!
England is 8 hours ahead of California, so Ron would go to bed at 4:00 p.m.
↑ ↑ ↑ Hope this helps! :D
<u>Evidently, Dr. Waung is working within the "cognitive" perspective.</u>
The cognitive perspective is related about comprehension mental procedures, for example, memory, recognition, considering, and critical thinking, and how they might be identified with conduct.
The cognitive perspective is concerned about "mental" capacities, for example, memory, recognition, consideration, and so forth. It sees individuals as being like PCs in the manner in which we process data (e.g., input-process-yield). For instance, both human brains and PCs process data, store information and have input a yield technique.
We might draw the conclusion that one of the key distinctions between societies based on caste and those based on class is the prevalence of social mobility in the latter.
<h3>What is caste based society?</h3>
- Endogamy, the hereditary transfer of a way of life that frequently includes a profession, ritual rank in a hierarchy, customary social contact,
- And exclusion based on cultural conceptions of purity and contamination are all characteristics of caste, a type of social stratification.
- Due to the system, the top castes now have privileges over the lower castes, which were frequently suppressed by those in positions of power.
- Inter-caste unions were outlawed for many years, and in villages, castes primarily lived apart and did not share facilities like wells.
- However, there have historically been a variety of caste systems around the world, with Africa and Asia being the most noteworthy examples.
- The caste systems of the Moors, Tuaregs, Somalis, Indians, Songbuns, and Koreans are a few examples.
Learn more about caste systems here:
brainly.com/question/25078974
#SPJ4
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
