Answer:
I would probably say the second choice but... definetly not the first option.
One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
<span>
<span>The Spanish resulted to countless inter-state wars, revolts
and coup d'états, which never allowed
the unity of Latin America. This was highlighted by the fact that Latin
America is a region with various and very diverse cultures that do not have a
sense of unity, and wouldn't even want to identify themselves with one
another.</span></span>
Answer:
When the Declaration of Independence says that unalienable rights are "endowed by their Creator," it means those rights are Inalienable.
Explanation:
Declaration of confederation affirmed that people are born with some incontrovertible rights.
The forerunners believed God and they were religious and conventional. Some rights are divinely imposed and they believed that no earthly power can deny them. So no government can reject theses rights.
They also believed that whenever any government became tyrannical and despotic, the common people had all rights to alter or abolish the existing government through protests can depose the government and help in bringing out a new government.
One of the major long term effects of the recognition of Christianity in Constantinople was that Christians were no longer persecuted, which led to Christianity becoming a major religion in Europe.
