I don’t think he was satisfied, Wilson tried arguing that he believed that the people in power should be punished, but not the entire country to suffer. His 14 points prove that. I think it was with a meeting with Britain and France I am unsure but here are some sources
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/the-treaty-of-versailles/woodrow-wilson/
https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaty-of-Versailles-1919
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A). Style involves word choice; tone involves the impression your message makes.
Explanation:
Style is demonstrated as the literary component that demonstrates the author's writing style which is reflected through employment of words, structure, syntax, rhetorical language in his/her text to create the desired effect like mood or atmosphere to elicit desired response while tone is demonstrated as the author's approach towards a particular subject matter that offers a framework/lenses to the audience to perceive the text in a contextual and comprehensive manner. Therefore, option A best elucidates the difference between the style and tone as <u>it correctly describes that 'style involves word-choice' that is associated with author's use of language and syntax while the 'tone makes the impression created by message' through the framework proposed by the author.</u> Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
The two smallest forms of government in the United States are a county and a municipal state.
All states are subdivided into provinces for smooth management. It acts the first-tier administrative section of the states in order to manage their own issues. The municipal state was developed in order to provide general administration for a particular region which mainly dependent on the population of that area.
They converse about each other's personalities, about treating people directly and on equal terms. It seems to her that Rochester sometimes speaks as if he were reading her mind.
Answer:
Yes, Canada is a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
No, peacekeeping is not a myth.
Explanation:
Peacekeepers country often put itself in a position as mediators between other countries that interacted with one another. Canada has done this several times throughout history (one small example would be when Canada mediate a conflict of imports quota between United States and Mexico).
On top of that, Canada also involved in several peacemakers mission when they sent their resources to help the people who are trapped within political conflicts. (one example of this would be when Canada sent help to Cambodia during four peace support missions from 1954 to 2000.)
\
From those historical events alone, I believe Canada could be considered as a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
