Government in the Middle Ages - Feudalism
The prevailing system of government in the Middle Ages was feudalism. Though the actual term “feudalism” was not used during the Middle Ages, what we now recognize as a feudalist system of government was in control in Medieval Europe. Feudalism was a way for the Kings and upper nobility to keep control over the serfs and peasants.
Definition
There is no universally accepted modern day definition of feudalism. The word “feudal” was coined in the 17th century, some 200 years after the end of feudalism in Europe. The term “feudalism” was coined later still, in the 19th century.
After the publication of Elizabeth A. R. Brown’s The Tyranny of a Construct, many scholars have found the term “feudalism” troubling and have wanted to drop it, not just as the title of government in the middle ages, but as a term altogether.
Feudalism is mainly used in discourse today as a comparison or analogical term applied to governmental structures in history. This is known as “semi-feudal.” The term has also been brought up in discussions of non-Western societies today whose governments resemble the feudal system in medieval Europe, but this use of the term is often deemed inappropriate.
The best and the most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice. The map shows that <span>empires were not necessarily one continuous territory. </span>I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
the enlightenment ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence were those of thomas locke an english enlightenment philosopher that Every man Man Has
The Jewish Law is also known as the "Halakhah". It is known as a way of life instead of just a religion that talks about human beings, the universe, and God. There are many practices that are present in the said law. "Halakhah" means "the path that one walks". The Jewish law is known to have come from the rabbis, the Torah, and the custom and according to them, it moves every part of life.
Answer:
Judicial interpretation refers to different ways that the judiciary uses to interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation. As a result, how justices interpret the constitution, and the ways in which they approach this task has a political aspect.