Which statement accurately describes a major difference between an essay's

World War Il caused the end of European imperialism. true or false

grin007 [14]

Answer:

World War Il caused the end of European imperialism. - true ( first choice)

5 0

3 years ago

james wants to estimate the absolute age of an animal fossil, however the test results show that that fossil doesnt contain any

____ [38]

From the provided options, the conclusion made by James regarding the lack of carbon 14 could be the use of relative dating in estimating the age of fossils.

The third option is the correct answer.

<h3>What are fossils?</h3>

Fossils are the remains of the dead organisms that are preserved for so many years in a museum.

According to the situation, James analyses that the fossils don't have any content of carbon 14 at the time of estimating the absolute age of that fossil of an animal. This happens may be due to the decay of that fossil over the years.

<u>Question's missing part:</u>

Following are the options in relation to the question:

1) Without carbon-14, it will be an impossible task to estimate the age of the fossil.

2) Finding another fossil nearby without carbon-14 will guarantee that he has matching fossils.

3) Without carbon-14, James can use relative dating to estimate the age of the fossil.

4) The animal's carbon-14 decayed long before the animal died.

5) The animal, whether living or dead, never had carbon-14 in its system.

Therefore, James can use the relative dating process in order to identify the age of an animal fossil.

Learn more about the fossils in the related link:

brainly.com/question/6867325

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

What where characteristics of the Roman republic

Bumek [7]

In Roman<span> society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the </span>Roman Republic<span>. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Is global history the same as world history and I need explanation

denis23 [38]

Answer:

World history, global history or transnational history is a field of historical study that emerged as a distinct academic field in the 1980s. It examines history from a global perspective. World History looks for common patterns that emerge across all cultures.Based on these definitions, the process of globalization largely differentiates global and world history. World history encompasses a history that is not necessarily completely interconnected through globalization, while global history examines this specific history of interconnectivity.

Explanation:

Valid upto 5 marks for seniors(6-9)

7 0

3 years ago

why are individual rights important to a democratic society in wartime? Why are there some limits on these rights?

ExtremeBDS [4]

There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.

Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.

Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv

4 0

3 years ago