Answer:
Ok I can help
Explanation:
but where is the options or passage ?
Answer:
urgent or critical
Explanation:
if there is an acute water shortage, it wouldn't be a high pitched water shortage, a keen or quick water shortage, or a sharp pain.
Pick the one that makes the most sense!
If you choose 3, it would be: The lack of rain in some places had led to a critical shortage of water.
Answer: A quote from online say:
"Censorship not only restricts words, images, and ideas, but also inhibits an individual's right to think freely. Censoring music, art, and literary works is meant to protect the conduct and morals of people, but in doing so, society is silencing an important voice."
Explanation:
So this means getting rid of censorship , then Censorship is an assault on the rights of all of us. So getting rid of censorship will have an impact.
Also, "The First Amendment exists to protect speech and activities that are unpopular if only those ideas which were popular were protected, it wouldn’t be needed. Limiting free speech is unAmerican without it, all our rights and liberties quickly disintegrate."
This also shows how Censorship plays a role in our lives as well.
* Hopefully the quotes to help me answer the question helps:)!! Mark me the brainliest:)
Answer:
this should be your answer.
Explanation:
I modified and adjusted these sentences from math to psychology, I am aware and hope that this will start a trend.
Answer:
- Congress had changed the meaning of the First Amendment, rather than enforcing it.
- Congress had created a law that was not proportional to the problem it was fixing.
- Congress had taken away states’ rights by passing the RFRA.
Explanation:
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 was passed in light of the Supreme Court upholding an Oregon state decision to deny two American Indian men unemployment benefits for having taken a banned substance which they normally use in their religious events.
Congress passed this bill with only 3 Senators opposing it so that it could prevent such from happening again.
The Supreme Court however ruled the Act as unconstitutional as it claimed that Congress was overexerting its powers by: changing the meaning of the First Amendment, creating a law that was disproportionate to the problems it was fixing and overexerting federal power on states and taking away their rights to manage their affairs in this regard.
