Answer:
$419,253
Explanation:
we must find the present value of a growing annuity:
present value = [monthly payment / (i - g)] x [1 - [(1 + g)ⁿ x (1 + i)⁻ⁿ]
- monthly payment = $2,000
- i = (1 + 0.06/12)¹² - 1 = 0.061678 / 12 = 0.005139833
- g = 5% / 12 = 0.004166667
- n = 20 x 12 = 240
present value = [$2,000 / (0.00514 - 0.00416)] x [1 - [(1 + 0.00416)²⁴⁰ x (1 + 0.00514)⁻²⁴⁰] = $2,040,816 x [1 - (2.7083 x 0.293) = $2,040,816 x (1 - 0.794566) = $419,252.99 = $419,253
Answer:
Why do you think it's important to think about whether or not
you'd want to do the role responsibilities as they are listed in the
job description?
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": interfere with the rationing function of prices.
Explanation:
While talking about price floors and price ceiling, <em>the rationing function of prices</em> refers to the fact that both governmental measures are imposed to protect sellers and buyers from unfair practices driven by supply and demand. Thus, price floors protect producers from prices that could go below their production costs and price ceilings protect buyers from prices that could be set above their income.
The rationing function of prices can be also understood as the measures taken to discourage demand to keep resources to use them over a determined period.
Answer:
B. $140,000.
Explanation:
Inventory purchases refers to the amount of goods or merchandise bought during a particular period by merchandisers or sellers such as retailers, wholesalers, or distributors with aim of selling them to customers.
Inventory purchases can be determined using the formula for computing the cost of goods sold as follows:
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + Inventory purchases - Ending inventory
Substituting the values in the question into the formula above and solve for inventory purchases, we have:
$145,000 = $18,000 + Inventory purchases - $13,000
Inventory purchases = $145,000 + $13,000 - $18,000 = $140,000
Therefore, inventory purchases equal <u>$140,000</u>.
Natural law for Josh, and legal positivism for Colin.
