Answer:
I had this question as well, the correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Answer:
judging
Explanation:
Anton's disregard for the entire speech of Callie after he concluded she is not a credible speaker because she is stumbled on some of her words is a clear barrier to listening. Callie still communicated good information but because Anton had concluded she isn't worth listening to, he had not listened and gotten the information Callie was passing.
The owners of the property claimed the city had violated the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, which forbade the government from seizing private property without just compensation for public use.
<h3>What was the central tenet in Kelo v. City of New London?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Kelo v. City of New London that New London could acquire privately owned lands for private development as part of its economic revitalization strategy.
The rationality of this project was The property owners contended that the city had violated the Amendment's takings provision, which guarantees that the government will not take private property for public use without just compensation.
Learn more about Kelo v. City of New London:
brainly.com/question/10992257
#SPJ1