All categories

4 years ago

Which situation exemplifies public action?

Business

1 answer:

Gnesinka [82]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

From the answer choices provided, the one that best exemplifies public action would be Government bureaucrats demand bribes from international businesses in return for the rights to operate in Cedia Republic. That is because in this scenario the bureaucrats are joining together in unison in order to demonstrate the power that they hold over their community, which by banding together they protect each other and become that much more powerful. Mainly because since they are unified they will have each other's backs and not interfere with the other's bribes.

You might be interested in

Pierce Company sold to Stanton Company merchandise on account FOB shipping point, 2/10, net 30, for $20,000. Pierce prepaid the

polet [3.4K]

Answer:

D. Accounts ReceivableStanton, debit $20,000; Sales, credit $20,000, and Delivery Expense, debit $500; Cash, credit $500

Explanation:

The Sale transaction must be ;

Trade Receivable - Stanton Company $20,000 (debit)

Revenue $20,000 (credit)

<em>Recognise the Revenue and Asset - Stanton Company</em>

Shipping Cost $500 (debit)

Bank $500 (credit)

<em>Recognise the shipping cost and de-recognise the cash asset</em>

3 0

3 years ago

_______________is concerned with what is, and ▼ positive analysis neutral analysis normative analysis is concerned with what ou

EastWind [94]

Answer:

The correct answer is normative analysis.

Explanation:

A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.

In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.

3 0

3 years ago

As Vince described his firm's landscape maintenance program to the buyer for Allentown Medical Center, Alex (the buyer) interrup

sasho [114]

Answer:

Direct denial

Explanation:

In responding to obejections one can use various methods that suits the particular situation. A person can provide a logical argument when the objection is valid in a bid to convince the other party that their product is suitable for their needs.

In this instance Vince's firm has been in operation for over 15 years. The objection that start-up landscaping firms go in and out of business in just a few months can be answered with a direct denial.

Vince told them the business is not a startup but has been in business for 15 years.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question:

soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer: its environmental scientist

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Cross Country Movers has just gone public. Under a firm commitment agreement, the firm received $19.84 for each of the 2.12 mill

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

= $11,670,200/ $41,329,800 x 100 = 28.24%

Explanation:

The question is to compute the flotation cost of the funds raised by Cross Country Movers after going public. Furthermore, it should be presented as a percentage.

The formula therefore, is = Total Direct Costs / Net Amount raised x 100

Step 1: Total Direct Costs

= Direct Costs (legal and others) + Indirect costs + (Initial Offering Price - the amount received for each share x total shares sold) + (Price rise in stock per share - the initial offering price per share x total shares sold)

= $626,000 + $105,000 + 9,667,200‬+ 1,272,000‬ = $11,670,200

Step 2: Net Amount Raised

= Amount recieved per share x total shares - Direct and indirect costs

= $19.84 x 2,120,000 shares - $626,000 + $105,000

= 42,060,800‬- 731,000‬ = $41,329,800

Step 3: Floatation Cost in Percentage

= $11,670,200/ $41,329,800 x 100 = 28.24%

4 0

3 years ago