<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
Because the colonists were throwing snowballs towards the soldiers and yelling things. while one of them tripped and accedently fired. while the other soldiers fired out of fear there was a ambush
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A: Not the answer. The population was still rural, especially in the southern states.
B: Only 1/2 the country was industrialized by the time the civil war began. The South had not really developed her cities. It was one of her problems during the civil war. Not B.
C: Jackson is best known for his dealing with the Native Americans and the Frontier.
D: It has to be this answer. Of course before the civil war the North was well developed and had large cities. After the civil war (which is what I'm thinking of) into the 1880s to the beginning of the 1900s was when the rails were built and great fortunes in Industry were made. I'd pick D but only if it was the time I'm describing.
No other answer is completely correct. D.
<span>War Hawks south and west both want war to gain more land
the native americans were just sitting there on the land. they then moved west</span>