The answer is: agencies supplying or granting the funds act as gatekeeper to scientific discoveries.
Granting organizations go about as guardians with exploratory discoveries furthermore innovative unrest innovations.
Act as a gatekeeper mean act as a secretary by the procedure in which a distinctive alternately aggregation controls right with merchandise what's more benefits be that especially to data also individuals with energy.
Answer:
Religious humanism is an integration of humanist ethical philosophy with congregational rites and community activity which center on human needs, interests, and abilities
Explanation:
Many people talk about academic excellence — but who or what really defines this elusive quality?
Michèle Lamont, Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, analyzes the system of peer review in her new book “How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment” (Harvard University Press, 2009). By examining the process of scholarly evaluation, she also addresses larger questions about academia.
“In some ways studying peer evaluation and review is a point of entry into a much broader issue, which is the issue of meritocracy in American higher education,” says Lamont.
To research the book, Lamont interviewed panelists from research councils and societies of fellows who were evaluating proposals for research funding in the social sciences and the humanities.
Lamont explains that academics must constantly make evaluations, whether of scientific findings or of graduate students. Expertise, personal taste, and the perspective of the evaluator play into the decision-making process, she writes.
“A lot of what the book does is to look at what criteria people use to judge and what meaning they give to these criteria,” says Lamont. “So for instance, what do they mean by ‘significance’ and what do they mean by ‘originality’? How does the definition of ‘originality’ and ‘significance’ vary between philosophy and economics? How strong is the consensus between fields?
<h3>
<em>Shahab-ud-din Muhammad Khurram[3] (5 January 1592 – 22 January 1666),[7] better known by his regnal name Shah Jahan (Persian: "King of the World"),[8] was the fifth Mughal emperor, who reigned from 1628 to 1658.[9] He is widely considered one of the greatest Mughal emperors; under his reign the Mughal Empire reached the peak of its glory.[10] Although an able military commander, Shah Jahan is perhaps best remembered for his architectural achievements. His reign ushered in the golden age of Mughal architecture. Shah Jahan commissioned many monuments, the best known of which is the Taj Mahal in Agra, which entombs his favourite wife, Mumtaz Mahal. His relationship with Mumtaz Mahal has been heavily adapted into Indian art, literature, and cinema.</em></h3>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>you</em>
Positive:
1. The right person pushes you to achieve your goals and better yourself. (Form healthy habits such as drinking/eating better, quit smoking, etc.)
2. Certain people influence how you see yourself, a positive influencer can boost mental health and self esteem.
Negative:
1. The wrong person could emotionally or physically harm you, leaving you drained and abused.
2. The wrong person may cause intentional harm in a way such as Munchausen by Proxy
