This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Choose the propaganda style that best fits the statement below. "My opponent, Governor Thomason has raised taxes, increased spending and lied to you, the American people."
plain folks
name calling
card stacking
bandwagon
Answer:
The propaganda style that best fits the statement is:
B. name calling.
Explanation:
We can easily reach the conclusion above via elimination. Let's take a look at each of the options:
A. plain folks: a style of propaganda that attempts to depict a certain person as "one of the people" or "average Joe". It's commonly used by politicians to show us they are ordinary people just like us. This option is INCORRECT.
<u>B. name calling: a style that consists of saying bad things about one's opponent in order to make people see him from a negative perspective. Often involves attributing pejorative nicknames or adjectives to the other. This is precisely what we have here, since the speaker is calling his opponent a liar. This option is CORRECT.</u>
C. card stacking: a style which manipulates information in order to make something or someone look better. This option is INCORRECT.
D. bandwagon: a technique that relies on the idea of "jumping on board" or "everyone else is doing this, and so should you." This is clearly not the case here. This option is INCORRECT.
I do agree with Chillingworth, it is definitely better not to keep a guilty secret because, in my personal opinion, keeping this kind of secrets is like swallowing a slow acting poison. This guilty secrets, when kept, make us behave in a way that might cause harm to others or to ourselves; in other words, keeping this kind of secrets allows the harmful, hurtful behavior, we are keeping within the secret, to continue.
If you decide to keep this kind of secrets, it immediately creates a barrier between you and the person who told you the secret, and eventually it would also create a barrier with the person that might be hurt by knowing what you have been told. It is actually better and almost a life rule, to live your life without having any secrets to keep at all and, also, to not do anything you can not tell the people you care the most or that later, as time passes by, you will regret.
Answer:
interdependence and individual rights.
Explanation:
The basis for organic solidarity is based on the notion of interdependece between individuals ,
According to Durkheim
"Organic solidarity turns into social cohesion as individuals rely more on each other "
Contrasted to Mechanical solidarity, where primitive societies or prior to industrialization show less dependence for a lack of specialized work:
The nomadic or hunting tribes, the typical example (mechanical solidarity)
With industrialization, specialization of work and the complementarities between people turn to the basis of organic solidarity.
Industrial societies (UK, Germany are historical examples)
One, I do know that Nicole should be LEAST concerned about having a newborn who has a deformed heart. However, I do have a sense of Life-Span of the fetus during pregnancy. So, I do believe she, Nicole, should be most concerned about having a newborn who has lower mental functioning.
This is because the main danger of <span>postnatal lead exposure is lower mental functioning in the newborn. </span>
The Articles of Confederation were abolished and The Constitution was put in its place in 1789 to better suit a Growing America!
