The people that criticized Bush's education initiative said that teachers would focus too much on tests and neglect other subjects.
<h3>What was President Bush's education initiative?</h3>
This was the no child left behind act that the President enacted in the year 2002.
The aim of the policy was to ensure that all the students in the United States had quality education.
Read more on the policy here: brainly.com/question/18980779
#SPJ4
Answer: the correct answer is B
Explanation: congress having the power to create a national bank was not in any part of the constitution therefore the most important question for the supreme court was whether they have the power or not. In the end, the supreme court stated that yes they do have the power although the power to create a national bank is not in the constitution congress does have the power of necessary and proper clause. the 2n question was whether the state can tax the federal government. and in the end, it was concluded that no state cannot tax a federal government this extends the power of the national government.
Answer:
To establish ethnic studies programs.
Explanation:
The San Francisco State College strike of 1968 was part of the Third World Liberation Front that protests against the Eurocentric educational lack of diversity. This movement would be based on the Universities of San Francisco and Berkeley's University of California.
The goal of the Asian American students or activists was to ensure the inclusion of ethnic studies in the universities. Their aim was to introduce and establish programs about different ethnicities.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
Your answer is C, or Investiture.
Explanation:
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it </em><em>helps!</em>
<em>D. Joint stock colony.</em>
<u>Here I will explain the different colonies and the answer to your question:</u>
<h3>Proprietary Colony</h3>
A proprietary colony is a colony that was given to a certain person or sometimes a group of people under the British crown. These people were called proprietors and they held power over the land in which they owned under the King.
<h3>Charter Colony</h3>
A charter colony is very similar to a proprietary colony, except it was governed by and used a royal charter. This made it so little to no interference from the British crown was present in the colony. Charter colonies were usually run by one person who would be the governor and the individuals of the colony could have a bit more freedom compared to other colonies.
<h3>Royal Colony</h3>
A royal colony is brought directly from the King himself. The King would make the rules overseas and send British government officials to go and run the colony for him. This made it so these colonies were usually used as profit for the British crown and many of the goods found under the Royal colony were sent to England.
<h3>
<em><u>Joint Stock Colony</u></em></h3>
A joint stock colony, which your question is referencing to, was a colony brought directly from investors that were from England. Many companies would sponsor these adventures to current day America, in hopes of getting profit. Individuals would then travel and set up colonies in the New World, where they would then sell items and goods exclusive to that region to the investors who would then make profit.
