Answer:
Another way that the two new superpowers differed was their economic policies (capitalism in the US, communism in the USSR) and their governmental systems (democratic republic in the US, totalitarianism in the USSR).
The United States menifested its destiny by trying to expand from coast to coast. But first the americans have to kick out the native americans because the native americans are in there land and is blocking there way to menifest.
So your answer would be <span>acquired all the land between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans</span>
The reason I believe Senator Smith uses language like stock, natural increase, breeds, pure, etc. is because she wants to buttress the point and she sees it as the only natural way to think is to put the verb that will passage the message of something that is not contaminated.
<h3>What does his use of these words tell you about the criteria by which he Judges others?</h3>
It tells me that He is a person who believes in the purity, truthfulness and credibility and we not succumb to the truth being tinted.
Senator Christine Elizabeth Smith is known to be a popular American politician and she is known to be a retired Democratic political consultant.
She was known to have serves as a United States senator from Minnesota and this has been since 2018 and she is known to be a member of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party.
Therefore, The reason I believe Senator Smith uses language like stock, natural increase, breeds, pure, etc. is because she wants to buttress the point and she sees it as the only natural way to think is to put the verb that will passage the message of something that is not contaminated.
Learn more about Senator Smith from
brainly.com/question/26690484
#SPJ1
Answer:
The credibility gap in the 1960s and 1970s was a distrust of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration's statements and policies on the Vietnam War.
Explanation:
The term "credibility gap" was used to describe the difference between what the government was saying and what the public actually believed.
Public statements that the President and his administration offered about the Vietnam War were lacking information. They focused on anti-communism and humanitarianism but did not inform on other things that were going on.
