Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
Answer:
what is that what the what no what is that no
<span>d. a person running 100 m straight across a field at a constant speed
</span>Which of the following has no acceleration?
a person running 100 m straight across a field at a constant speed
NOT:
a. a satellite orbiting at a constant speed
b. a person running once around a track at a constant speed
c. a car making a turn at a constant speed
