Answer:
Helllo there 
Explanation:
Don't stop scrolling until you found the answer 
Don't stop...
?......?
I said dont stop!
Are you kidding me I said dont stop 
You can't post that file without permission 
Sorry dude I need to do this 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The function of your paper's conclusion is to restate the main argument. It reminds the reader of the strengths of your main argument(s) and reiterates the most important evidence supporting those argument(s).
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Hello. You did not enter the answer options, but I can help you by showing that the most punctual difference between the "" early bird "" and the "" balancing act "" styles is the way each style performs tasks in relation to the time to complete them.
Explanation:
The "early bird" and "balancing act" styles are forms of time management in relation to the accomplishment of tasks. These two styles are very different. The "early bird" is the style of people who carry out their tasks and obligations as quickly as possible, optimizing time and being free of obligations as soon as possible. On the other hand, the "balancing act" is the style of people who establish a routine with defined times throughout the day reserved for carrying out tasks.
The "balancing act" is not concerned with speed, like the "early bird", but the "early bird" can end up performing tasks without really understanding them because of his concern with speed.
 
        
             
        
        
        
This question seems to be incomplete. However, there´s enough information to find the right answer. 
Answer:
In his book How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity, and the Hidden Power of Character, Paul Tough uses James Black's story as an example of how although having good cognitive abilities is necessary,  hard work and proper education is much more important to turn intelligence into academic success.  
Explanation:
James´amazing talent at playing chess, which usually indicates a high intelligence, didn´t match his academic results despite his teacher´s efforts. According to Tough, James´main obstacle was the deficiency of his education throughout his life, and not a lack of resolution or intellectual capacity. Furthermore, he praises Elizabeth Spiegel, James´teacher, for her efforts to get the kid to get better academic achievements, and claims that it´s teachers like her who actually understand educational needs and the importance of helping students develop their own intellectual abilities.