1. According to Atticus, the Cunninghams family are a group of 'proud people'. They work really hard for their allowance, follow the law, and take care of the people around them. The ewells on the other hand, are filled with law breakers and entitled people who believe they could do whatever they pleases.
2. No. Eventhough the Ewells is indeed poor, the town do not treat them as commonfolk.
The regulators in the city know that if they do not bend the rules for Bob Ewell, he is cruel enough to let his children starve to death.
3. Both of the cunninghams and the Ewell are considered poor. But the cunninghams are considered even more poor than the Ewells.
The Finch family is not particularly rich, but they are considerably more well-off compared to cunninghams and Ewell.
4. It is how Atticus see the attittude of both families. Despite being poor, The cunninghams keep their human dignity and always try their best to become decent citizens, the Ewell on the other hand are really lazy and always break the law.
A theocracy is a form of government ruled by "god." The definition is, "a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god." Priests would be the ones to settle disputes and rule the people in a theocracy.
I believe the answer is: Tsarina Alexandra
Tsarina Alexandra is the spouse of Tsar Nicholas II , which was appointed as the temporary ruler when he took command of the battlefield. She was murdered along with her immediate family after refusing to conform to the will of the high Aristocrats within the kingdom.
Answer:
d. Either A or C
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Big Corp will likely win if it can establish as a defense that either Pam was denied the promotion for legitimate non-discriminatory reasons or the denial of the promotion was based on mixed motives. Any of these two defenses would tell the court that there were other reasons as to why Pam was denied the promotion and it is not due to gender, which would make Pam's argument invalid.
The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Thus, Option D is the correct statement.
<h3>Why was the "separate but equal" doctrine rejected?</h3>
The Supreme Court overturned decades of law when it ruled that the country's laws prohibiting equal access to racially-based education violated an equal protection provision of Article 14.
Thus, The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Option D is the correct statement.
Learn more about "separate but equal" here:
brainly.com/question/16995413
#SPJ1