Explain collective action problems and free riding, and how groups get around these problems through benefits of participation (i.e., solidary benefits and purposive benefits), coercion, and selective incentives.
collective action problem; situation in which members of a group would benefit by working together to produce some outcome, but each individual is better off refusing to cooperate and reaping benefits from those who do the work; one individuals efforts will not make a big difference; individual is better off free riding, can not do any work but still enjoy successes of group; even when people agree something would be good, cooperation isn't easy or automatic
free riding; relying on others to contribute to a collective effort and not participating on ones own behalf, but still benefiting from the groups successes
mechanism to promote cooperation: benefits from participation, coercion, selective incentives
soldiery benefits-satisfaction derived from the experience of working with like-minded people, even if the groups efforts do not achieve the desired impact
purposive benefit- satisfaction that comes from working to achieve a common goal
coercion- requiring participation; ex. labor unions require union dues as condition
selective incentives- benefits only given to members of an interest group
hope this helps.
Answer:
Explanation:
An amendment is a change or addition to the terms of a contract or document. An amendment is often an addition or correction that leaves the original document substantially intact.
Answer:
<u>In the Gurung community of Nepal, Rodhi is a club for the teenagers, usually for the age group of 10/11. It is an ideal institution for entertainment under the supervision of an adult Those who are in Rodhi remain together until the age of 17/18 or till they are married</u>
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS
The answer is "general intelligence (g) factor".
General intelligence, otherwise called as g factor, alludes to the presence of a wide mental limit that impacts execution on subjective capacity measures. Charles Spearman first depicted the presence of general intelligence in 1904. As indicated by Spearman, this g factor was in charge of general execution on mental capacity tests. Spearman noticed that while individuals unquestionably could and regularly excelled in specific zones, individuals who did well in one zone tended additionally to do well in different regions.
For instance, a man who does well on a verbal test would likely additionally do well on different tests.
The answer is police discretion, this is a type of decision which
is in particular with police officers of having to decide whether the matter is
ignored as it is part of their work or either to get someone arrested.
