<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the most authoritative source would be a primary source. </span>
Answer: The Suez Canal. Hope this helps you and any others out!!!
Explanation:
The anti-imperialist argued that:
- <span>imperialism is immoral because we diminish other cultures and forcing them to follow ours.
- The process of annexation would cost a huge amount of money that would cripple our own economy.
- The mentality of defeat and conquer could affect how citizens think and imposed the same principle to other citizens of united states, which would create a division in the country,</span>
It means that Rome has a soft belly
Although this question is opinionated, I believe that a government is absolutely mandatory to have a successful society. You simply cannot count on your citizens to agree on everything and all obey laws. It is human nature to want something for nothing, which is what laws are in place to prevent. You also would not have any form of protection such as a military, which means your society would get taken over by someone wot ha government very, very quickly. To put it short, yes, a government is 100% required.<span />
