The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
The Copernican Revolution changed Europe's GOVERNMENT AND RULING CLASS
Answer:
the act required each state to show that race was not an admission criterion or to designate a separate land grant
The land disputes with Great Britain over land ownership and use in North America were settled primarily by diplomatic negotiation. This is the explicit and formal acknowledgement of a government or of the national independence of a country. These negotiations normally occurs between two countries. The correct answer is B. Diplomatic negotiations.
