<span>You should not have to site it formally. If you are quoting something it says directly, just put the quote in quotation marks and state where the quote came from. Examples:
No author marker:
The such and such plaque says, "Something worthy of putting in your paper goes here."
Marker or plaque with an author:
On the historical marker at such and such place, John Doe states, "Something that your reader needs to know goes here."
Marker or plaque that quotes a famous figure:
Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying, "Something poignant or thought provoking goes here," on the such and such plaque.
If you are paraphrasing the same rule basically applies. For example:
According to the such and such marker, something very interesting and relevant to your paper would go here.
There is no need to do a formal APA or MLA citation with the quote or include it in your reference page.</span>
Answer:
Be born in the U.S.
Sign the papers to become a citizen
Get married to a citizen
Explanation:
Answer:
Option: They wanted to seek silver and gold there.
Explanation:
Americans first travel across the Great Plains to get gold and silver in the 1800s. After the Civil War, a vast amount of people from the east began to move in the West in search of gold. The first wave of settlers to the West were miners. The great plains region consists of Texas, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma.
ANSWER IS A. Old Spanish trail
Hope this helps
The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.
Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.
