Andrew Jackson was a strict constructionist. This means that he had a strict interpretation of the United States Constitution, as opposed to a loose constructionist who had a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution. He believed that it should not be up for interpretation and should be interpreted how it is stated.
The Bank of the United States was quite a controversial topic during this time, as strict constructionists thought it was against the United States Constitution since there was nowhere in it that stated the bank could be created. On the other hand, loose constructionists did not think having a bank was unconstitutional because it was "<em>necessary and proper</em>." They would continue to use this Necessary and Proper Clause or the "<em>elastic clause</em>" to push for things that were not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
The act ignored the traditional Native American views of land ownership. Hope this helps!
Answer:
looking for personal freedom and jobs
Explanation:
Since the industry started to develop in the United States, the interest among the people to migrate to it increased even more. The reasons for this were that the United States had industry that was growing very quickly, so labor force was demanded, thus the job opportunities were plenty. Another reason for the migration was personal freedom. The United States were seen as the country in which the people can express themselves freely, and that if they work hard enough and are capable enough, they can easily progress and became part of the higher class, which of course was very attractive for the ordinary people.
