Land improvements are capitalized separately from Land because land improvements have only a limited useful life.
Land is a special fixed asset which means that:
- It is purchased for long term use
- It is not depreciated because it lasts forever
Land improvements on the other hand, will not last forever. They will eventually wear out and need to be replaced. They are therefore capitalized separately from land so that they can be depreciated if need be.
In conclusion, land improvements are capitalized separately from land because they have a limited useful life.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14436052.</em>
Answer: Social construct
Explanation:
The organizational effectiveness is the social construct that it is basically defined by the individual and groups instead of existing in external world independently.
Social construct basically influence the organization for their actual rights and actions. Basically, it is the idea which are accepted and created by the society people.
In the social construct all the people unite together rather than exist independently. It basically assign notion and meaning that are assign to each object in the environment.
You're correct. Because the definition of a franchise business is "<span>A </span>franchise<span> is a </span>business system<span> in which </span>private<span> entrepreneurs </span>purchase the rights<span> to open and </span>run<span> a </span>location of a larger company<span>."</span>
Answer:
A. can choose the quantity of butter that it produces but not the price at which it sells its butter.
Explanation:
Taking into consideration the characteristic of the market explained in the exercise we would say that it is a Competitive Market.
One of the characteristics of a Perfect Competitive Market is that the price of the products is determined by the market, which means that no single seller can't change or influence the price on its own.
Hope it helps. Good luck.
168,000 is amount of the gain is Ethan allowed to exclude from his gross income
Solution:
Ethan's post 2009 non-qualified use is 2 years.
He owned the property for 10 years so he is not allowed to exclude 20% of the gain
= $210,000 × 20% = $42,000
He is allowed to exclude = ($210,000 - $42,000)
= $168,000
