1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
3 years ago
8

Hypothesis: Children in families that eat dinner together at least four times per week experience fewer behavioral problems in s

chool. In this hypothesis, what is the dependent variable?
a. how often children misbehave in school
b. how much time children spend with their families
c. the number of times per week that a family eats together
d. the nutritional value of the food children eat with their families
Social Studies
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a. how often children misbehave in school

Explanation:

Here, it being studied whether the number of times the children eat together with their families affects the child's behavior at school.

So, one variable is the number of times the children eat together with their families and the other variable is the behavior of the child at school.

The variable which changes irrespective of the other variable is called the independent variable.

The variable which changes with respect to the independent variable is the dependent variable.

Hence, how often children misbehave in school is the dependent variable and the number of times the children eat together with their families is the independent variable.

You might be interested in
How was the press involved in bringing down McCarthy? At least 3 sentences
anastassius [24]

Answer:

Senator Joseph McCarthy begins hearings investigating the United States Army, which he charges with being “soft” on communism. These televised hearings gave the American public their first view of McCarthy in action, and his recklessness, indignant bluster, and bullying tactics quickly resulted in his fall from prominence.

In February 1950, Senator McCarthy charged that there were over 200 “known communists” in the Department of State. Thus began his dizzying rise to fame as the most famous and feared communist hunter in the United States. McCarthy adeptly manipulated the media, told ever more outrageous stories concerning the communist conspiracy in the United States, and smeared any opponents as “communist sympathizers” to keep his own name in the headlines for years. By 1954, however, his power was beginning to wane. While he had been useful to the Republican Party during the years of the Democratic administration of President Harry S. Truman, his continued attacks on “communists in government” after Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower took over the White House in 1953 were becoming political liabilities.

In an effort to reinvigorate his declining popularity, McCarthy made a dramatic accusation that was a crucial mistake: in early 1954, he charged that the United States Army was “soft” on communism. McCarthy was indignant because David Schine, one of his former investigators, had been drafted and the Army, much to McCarthy’s surprise, refused the special treatment he demanded for his former aide. In April 1954, McCarthy, chairman of the Government Operations Committee in the Senate, opened televised hearings into his charges against the Army.

The hearings were a fiasco for McCarthy. He constantly interrupted with irrelevant questions and asides; yelled “point of order” whenever testimony was not to his liking; and verbally attacked witnesses, attorneys for the Army, and his fellow senators. The climax came when McCarthy slandered an associate of the Army’s chief counsel, Joseph Welch. Welch fixed McCarthy with a steady glare and declared evenly, “Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness…Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” A stunned McCarthy listened as the packed audience exploded into cheers and applause. McCarthy’s days as a political power were effectively over. A few weeks later, the Army hearings dribbled to a close with little fanfare and no charges were upheld against the Army by the committee. In December 1954, the Senate voted to censure McCarthy for his conduct. Three years later he died of complications from cirrhosis of the liver.

or if its too long use this below

On December 2, 1954, the Senate voted to censure Senator McCarthy by a vote of 67–22, making him one of the few senators ever to be disciplined in this fashion. He continued to speak against communism and socialism until his death at the age of 48 at Bethesda Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, on May 2, 1957.

Explanation:

I hope I helped out!!

5 0
3 years ago
When a researcher uses a qualitative and quantitative approach to collecting data, this is referred to as: scientific integrity
laila [671]

It should be noted that the use of qualitative and quantitative approach to collecting data is known as Triangulation.

<h3>What is triangulation?</h3>

Triangulation simply means the method that is used by researchers to increase the validity and credibility of research findings.

Triangulation is when a researcher uses a qualitative and quantitative approach to collecting data. This is important to make the work credible.

Learn more about triangulation on:

brainly.com/question/1558502

7 0
2 years ago
1. An example of an asset would be a: Group of answer choices
aev [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

How do scientists obtain knowledge about the World select all that apply

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jeff and Erica have two children. They plan to purchase life insurance using this formula: (18 minus Youngest child's age) × $10
Fed [463]

They are using Nonworking spouse method to determine their life insurance needs.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

Non-working spouse methods refer the method which can use when there is a single earner in the family. Since there is formula where eighteen is the minimum age required to declare oneself as a major, the non-working spouse method can be used when one can get enough financial support until the children are eighteen years old. So concluding, this is the method that can be used to determine Jeff’s and Erica’s life insurance needs.

3 0
3 years ago
This company is designed to be a place "where everyone involved feels good about their conservation efforts." It can be said tha
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

Organizational commitment

Explanation:

Organizational commitment is the individual's psychological attachment to organization in which he/she is working. These studies show how workers feel and respond about their jobs. Thus, if they can become more committed to the organizations.

The studies also predicts the work variables such as organizational citizenship behavior, turnover and job performance.

<u>Thus, having such good belief in their organization, it reflects that they have high organizational commitment.</u>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Carefully review the research matrix presented below. If this is a within subjects design, how many total participants will be u
    10·1 answer
  • Can picture the teacher in their mind.
    7·2 answers
  • The diagram below shows some ocean floor features.
    9·1 answer
  • During your trip to another country, it is important to try to be aware of the cultural differences in communication styles to a
    12·2 answers
  • Why did mario brajuha refuse to turn over his research notes to the authorities even when subpoenaed?
    15·1 answer
  • What kind of bill must start in the House of Representatives before it goes the Senate
    15·2 answers
  • How is both perceived power and real power both beneficial as well as detrimental?
    14·1 answer
  • Your house is worth $100,000. What are your property taxes each year?
    13·2 answers
  • The Bible does not tell how many wise men came.<br><br> True<br> False
    11·1 answer
  • GIVE ME THE CORRECT ANSWERS AND I WILL CASHAPP YOU 50$
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!