The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer:
The answer is $56.68
Explanation:
Solution
We recall that:
The firm paid a dividend of =$7.80
The projected growth of dividends is at a rate = 9.0%
The annual return = 24.0%
Now,
V = ($7.80 * (1.09)/(.24 - 0.9)
= (8.502)/(.24-0.9)
= (8.502) * (-0.66)
= $56.68
Therefore, this would be the most we would pay for the stock. If we paid less than that, our return would be above the 24%.
Answer:
Decrease (debit) in equity, Cash Dividends Payable (credit, liability account)
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the declaration of the cash dividends involves a decrease (debit) to Retained Earnings (a stockholders' equity account) and an increase (credit) to Cash Dividends Payable (a liability account).
(opentextbc.ca)
Answer:
The answer is C. Money Laundering
Explanation:
Solution
From the question stated it can be described as a crime of money laundering.
Money laundering involves the use of illegally obtained money for legitimate purposes.
In this scenario, Jeff uses $15,000 from his illegal sales of drug paraphernalia for setting up a toy store. The origin of the money, which was obtained through illegal method was hidden.
Robbery and larceny are examples of theft that involves stealing items of value from another person. Embezzlement is also a kind of theft. It involves withholding of items with the intention of theft
.
