<span>After gaining independence from Britain, Ghana's economy languished for three decades. These was there because of continuous coups that took place within the Ghana economy. The Ghana experience teaches us that economic and political systems and economic growth are related together. If any of the pillar falls, then other two pillars also cannot stand on its own and they two will also fall eventually.</span>
Based on the excerpt and the speech in it, we can infer that the American imperialists<u> saw the </u><u>Philippines </u><u>as a </u><u>useful base</u><u> for </u><u>increasing American trade</u><u> with </u><u>East Asia.</u>
The views of the American imperialists were that:
- The Philippines were owned by the United States
- The Philippines were to be used as a base to penetrate China and its markets
The American imperialists believed that the Philippines were theirs and that they had the right to use it as they pleased including as a means to reach the valuable markets of China and the rest of East Asia.
In conclusion, the imperialists viewed the Philippines as a gateway to the East.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/16384818. </em>
I need the statements to answer the question for you.
The goal of England's mercantilist policy was to make the country richer.
In those days, people believed that mercantilism was the best way to do this. In the 1600s and 1700s (and even into the 1800s) most people believed in mercantilism.
Hope this helps! Please mark me brainliest!
Matthew begins by calling Jesus the son of David, indicating his royal origin, and also son of Abraham, indicating that he was an Israelite; both are stock phrases, in which son means descendant, calling to mind the promises God made to David and to Abraham.