The ruling is that States must regulate commerce within their boundaries.
The case Wabash v. Illinois (1886) is about allegations of discrimination by the state's regulations because cost of transporting from New York to Giman Illinois is more cheaper than transporting from Peoria, Illinois to Gilman, Illinois.
- The case was access by the Supreme Court and then limited the right of states to regulate businesses that dealt with interstate commerce.
In conclusion, the case ruling state that the States must regulate commerce within their boundaries.
Learn more about Wabash v. Illinois here
<em>brainly.com/question/5136373</em>
The correct answer is: "The Plessy decision meant that segregation was <u>not unconstitutional</u>"
The "separate but equal" lemma that was accepted in the decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated public facilities under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality (for example, schools or public transport), such system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
Answer:
The third one ( or C idk)
Explanation:
That crisis made the fear of a atomic war more real than everthing at the time, and showed to everyone that the thing could go nuclear at any time because the tensions between the countries
Fur trade is the new economic activity in new france