Answer: Unalienable rights
An added note of explanation:
You'll see both "unalienable" and "inalienable" used in description of these sorts of rights that cannot be taken away because they are not granted by man but are ever human being's natural possession. In the final version of the <em>Declaration of Independence, </em>the spelling <em>unalienable </em>was used. That was the copy of the document as transcribed by John Adams, which was used for printed copies to be made. Thomas Jefferson's original draft used the spelling <em>inalienable</em>. The two variations of the word were both in use at the time in the 18th century. Either way, the word means something that cannot be made alien to you -- in other words, something that is naturally your possession and cannot be taken away from you.
Yorktown sits on a hill overlooking the York River. Which can be great, if you can keep provisioned.
The British were not able to keep provisioned, though. The American Army laid siege to the city, surrounding it on three sides, while the French Navy cut off the water access to Yorktown and cut Lord Cornwallis' army off from its supplies.
Based on the results of cross-sectional intelligence testing, <u>younger </u><u>generations were considered to be</u><u> smarter</u><u> than older ones fo</u>r the first half of the twentieth century.
According to the research, it should be noted that intelligence increases in childhood. It then peaks in adolescence then it gradually decreases as one grows older.
The article further stated that younger people are smarter than older ones. Therefore, younger generations were considered to be smarter than older ones for the first half of the twentieth century.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25577952
Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.