Hamilton's next objective was to create a Bank of the United States, modeled after the Bank of England. A national bank would collect taxes, hold government funds, and make loans to the government and borrowers. One criticism directed against the bank was "unrepublican"--it would encourage speculation and corruption. The bank was also opposed on constitutional grounds. Adopting a position known as "strict constructionism," Thomas Jefferson and James Madison charged that a national bank was unconstitutional since the Constitution did not specifically give Congress the power to create a bank.
Hamilton responded to the charge that a bank was unconstitutional by formulating the doctrine of "implied powers." He argued that Congress had the power to create a bank because the Constitution granted the federal government authority to do anything "necessary and proper" to carry out its constitutional functions (in this case its fiscal duties).
In 1791, Congress passed a bill creating a national bank for a term of 20 years, leaving the question of the bank's constitutionality up to President Washington. The president reluctantly decided to sign the measure out of a conviction that a bank was necessary for the nation's financial well-being.
Answer:
They got the right to vote and they stopped segregation
Explanation:
Answer:
First statement is false, second statement is true and the third statement is true.
Answer:
in order (e= executive, l=legislative)
L
E
L
E
E
L
E
E
L
E
L
L
L
Im 90% sure
Explanation:
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
Point 1- Avoiding french future hostility encompassing it with more grounded nations (ie-Switzerland perceived as an autonomous country).
Point 2- Reestablish a parity of intensity so no nation danger to each other.
Point 3-Wanted to reestablish European imperial families to the honored positions they had held before Napoleon's victories.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
After the Napoleonic Wars, focal Europe as often as possible saw essential discretionary exchanges, and urban communities, for example, Vienna, Aix-la-Chapelle, Carlsbad, Troppau, and Laibach filled in as the spots for meet of European rulers and negotiators. Austrian Chancellor Clemens Wenzel Lothar Nepomuk Prince von Metternich-Winneburg assumed a main job at these gatherings somewhere in the range of 1814 and 1822, and he especially needed them to occur in the regions of the Austrian Empire since he could in this manner better control their course and apply impact over the occasions to a degree without a doubt surpassing the genuine intensity of the express whose intrigues he upheld.
