It is based on the principle of federalism, where power is shared between the federal government and state governments. The powers of the federal government have generally expanded greatly since the Civil War.
The Helsinki Accords were primarily an effort to reduce tension between the Soviet and Western blocs by securing their common acceptance of the post-World War II status quo in Europe. ... The Helsinki Accords are nonbinding and do not have treaty status.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Was the supposed unfairness of the Treaty a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany--or was it merely a convenient rhetorical tool for German politicians to exploit?
I think that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were unfavorable for Germany, although, this nation had to assume part of its responsibility for the damage and destruction caused during World War I.
Under the Treaty of Versailles, signed in Paris, France, at the end of World War I, the victorious allies forced Germany to pay for the repairments. It was a fortune. Germany also lost some territories.
Yes, the supposed unfairness of the Treaty was a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany. But let's be honest, the Weimer Republic was not successful to rebuild the country that suffered from poverty. The political conditions were set to the arrival of dictator Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party. He was the kind of leader Germany needed at that time. He found the perfect circumstances in Germany to flourish.
Answer:
,I hope so this will help ypu
There weren't enough peasants that could work for the king and the population kept dying and decreasing
