Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
Answer:
is the last part of something, its end or result. when you write a paper, you always end by summing up your arguments and drawing a conclusion about what you've been writing about.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Many things people use everyday come from plants, trees and forests. They do not come from the ocean. Almost all the things we use everyday come from plants as they are the producers. Apart from food, they benefit us a lot too.
![\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Hope this helped!
<h3>~AH1807</h3>
Answer:
C. Irony
Explanation:
According to the given sentence, the author talks about people thinking they are liberated because they can take their phone anywhere.
This statement brings a sense of irony because the speaker clearly believes that people are not liberated because they are in fact imprisoned by their attachment/addiction to their mobile phone.
Irony is defined as a situation where events are contrary to what one expects and can be amusing.
He definitely wasn't all there, if you know what I mean
