I think the answer to this question is D.20%
Answer:
- infrastructure
- trade
-Visitors and immigration
-civil defense
-border control
Explanation:
-This is the physical system that make up a nation activities which include electricity, road, sewage system, communication.
- This is act of transferring goods and services from an entity to another entity for the exchange of money.
-This is the inflow of people into a country for the purpose of visit or search for greener pastures.
-This is an administration set up to protect citizens from military attacks and natural disasters.
- This are measures taken by a country to monitor it's borders so as to regulate movement of people and goods.
Both of the blanks should say "higher"
Answer:
c. Issuing accounting standards that must be followed by issuers in financial reporting.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was established under the Federal law to oversee the accounting industry by creating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is a standard setting body for matters related to registered public accounting firms including auditing and quality control. The Generally Accepted Accounting Principles is a combination of authoritative standards set by policy boards which aims to improve the clarity, consistency of the communication of financial information.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board however is not an accounting standard setting body and does not regulate the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles affecting the financial statements of issuers.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
