Answer: The city council should careful evaluate the benefits of reduced fatalities against the costs of the light and the extra time that the drivers will spend waiting for a green light
Explanation: Installing the traffic light which could reduce the fatalities caused on the highway is a good development. However, there are more factors to be considered when embarking on projects of such nature. The projected cost of a project is just as important as the project to itself. It project cost is so high such that the community does not have the required fund to cater for it, then the project should be delayed or altered for a subordinate solution until funds become available.
The extra time require to wait for a green light, if the commuters cannot be patient enough to follow traffic signals, the effort won't reap the required outcome.
Answer: “C” is the answer bc the answer is “the production of goods”
Explanation:
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
I would tell the Slavs that our god is actually the same as their gods and that we name it differently and present him in a diffferent light and that he has shown us the right way and that they should subject tmeselves to his will which will save them from eternal hell.
Answer:
publics
Explanation:
In public relation or PR terminology, the employees of the organisation Forever 21 can be categorized s they are the company's public.
One of the main purpose of public relation in an organisation is to create mutual harmony and goodwill among the individual employees and the organisation. Thus Forever 21 tries to create goodwill among its employees who are considered as 'publics' by them.
Therefore the answer is --- "publics".