I think it was Armed conflict
Explanation:
The SMART in SMART goals stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound. Defining these parameters as they pertain to your goal helps ensure that your objectives are attainable within a certain time frame.
Answer No 1:
The English Bill of Rights denounced King James II for abusing his power.The English Bill of Rights clearly established that the monarchy could not rule without consent of Parliament. The English Bill of Rights had a great influence on the colonies in North America and on the Constitution of the United States.
Answer No 2:
Principles in the Introduction of the Declaration of Independence state that:
The 1776 American Declaration of Independence states that:
- All men are created equal and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; these are unalienable rights - rights that government cannot take away.
- Governments obtained their power from the consent of the people .
- Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press
.
- Due process of law, including protection from unfair imprisonment
.
- Trial by jury protecting people from “cruel and unusual punishment.
Although, we are fighting in some of the scenarios but comparative to the olden times we are a lot better and have achieved maximum of these goals.
Answer:
C. Varieties of an element that differ only in the number of neutrons are called isotopes.
Explanation:
The Earth is approximately
old. The solar system formed from giant gas clouds which was a part of the solar nebula.
The surface of soil which demarcates two soils of different geological ages is called a unconformity.
Palesol is the soil that lies between sediments or volcanic deposits. If the paleosol is older they have lithified rock.
Hence, option C is true.
Answer:
Vicarious liability
Explanation:
Liability depends not on an individual's own misconduct but on that person's relationship with the wrongdoer. As per the common law of the United States, a participant of a conspiracy could be considered vicariously liable for the crimes that were committed by his co-conspirators in a case where the acts of the co-conspirators were intentional and performed in order to further the conspiracy's intent.