Answer:
75 shares
Explanation:
In this specific scenario, it seems that Kevin is treated to 75 shares prior to the redemption. This is calculated by adding the 50 shares that Kevin holds directly prior to the redemption itself as well as the 25 extra shares that are held by AMI. These 25 shares are 50% of the total 50 shares that AMI holds since Kevin is a 50% partner.
<span>1. </span>Employ
a business that caters the needs of people such as owning a gymnasium. That way
it improves the quality of life of a person.
<span>2. </span>Basing
on the example above, it does not engage into any harmful practice.
<span>3. </span>Your
decision will depend on increasing the fee of gym users or improving the
interior design of your gym
<span>4. </span><span>It
provides support to the employee because they can interact with the gym users
and can use the gym too</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is predictive validity test.
Explanation:
A predictive validity test is carried out in order to predict the performance that a collaborator will have in the future. With this dynamic, it is ensured that an honest employee is hired, and that he always acts under the rules of the organization to which he will belong. In general, there are discrepancies compared to what many people can do under certain circumstances, and this test is precisely what they want to know about the performance under different scenarios.
Answer:
$44,955.10
$38,131.84
Explanation:
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator
Investment X
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 9 = $6900
I = 7%
PV = $44,955.10
Investment Y
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 5 = $9300
I = 7%
PV = $38,131.84
To find the PV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Coke tried to diversify into the bottling industry by acquiring their bottlers and in the process creating a vertically integrated business. However, 5 years later, they did find out how difficult it was and it led to a failed diversification effort when sold off their bottling operations. This was majorly due to the fact that the bottling business required too much capital investment and time. Capital investment and time that an already large enterprise like coca cola couldn't afford at that period. The initial aim was to have control over the whole production process, but soon after the diversification failed, they went back to producing just the concentrates.
