Answer:
President Eisenhower believed that the United States had "to maintain balance" between defense spending and the needs of a healthy economy.
Explanation:
In his speech, Eisenhower warned that the United States faced a "hostile ideology" global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose," and must bear "without complaint the burdens of a long and complex struggle."
Answer:
The Shang Dynasty was a monarchy.
Explanation:
The kings of the Shang Dynasty, was a monarchy, where the people were ruled by a king. In this type of government, the people involved were, the king, and his noblemen, fortune tellers, and governors. The king had the power to appoint noblemen to rule each city state. Additionally, the king had the power to say when crops could be planted. Moreover, the noblemen had the authority to recruit soldiers to defend the city state from invaders. The only way to gain the throne was to inherit it, by being the king's younger brother or oldest son.
TRANSLATED ANSWER :explain how the process of the earthen enclosures in England influenced the English revolutionary process during the seventeenth century : ANSWER : Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England of consolidating (enclosing) small landholdings into larger farms.[1] Once enclosed, use of the land became restricted to the owner, and it ceased to be common land for communal use. In England and Wales the term is also used for the process that ended the ancient system of arable farming in open fields. Under enclosure, such land is fenced (enclosed) and deeded or entitled to one or more owners. The process of enclosure began to be a widespread feature of the English agricultural landscape during the 16th century. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons had become largely restricted to rough pasture in mountainous areas and to relatively small parts of the lowlands.
Enclosure could be accomplished by buying the ground rights and all common rights to accomplish exclusive rights of use, which increased the value of the land. The other method was by passing laws causing or forcing enclosure, such as Parliamentary enclosure involving an Inclosure Act. The latter process of enclosure was sometimes accompanied by force, resistance, and bloodshed, and remains among the most controversial areas of agricultural and economic history in England. Marxist and neo-Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used their control of state processes to appropriate public land for their private benefit.[2][better source needed] During the Georgian era, the process of enclosure created a landless working class that provided the labour required in the new industries developing in the north of England. For example: "In agriculture the years between 1760 and 1820 are the years of wholesale enclosure in which, in village after village, common rights are lost".[3] E. P. Thompson argues that "Enclosure (when all the sophistications are allowed for) was a plain enough case of class robbery."[4][5]
W. A. Armstrong, among others, argued that this is perhaps an oversimplification, that the better-off members of the European peasantry encouraged and participated actively in enclosure, seeking to end the perpetual poverty of subsistence farming. "We should be careful not to ascribe to [enclosure] developments that were the consequence of a much broader and more complex process of historical change."[6] "The impact of eighteenth and nineteenth century enclosure has been grossly exaggerated ..."[7][8]
Enclosure is considered one of the causes of the British Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer who was free to adopt better farming practices. There was widespread agreement in contemporary accounts that profit making opportunities were better with enclosed land.[9] Following enclosure, crop yields increased while at the same time labour productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labour. The increased labour supply is considered one of the causes of the Industrial Revolution.[10] Marx argued in Capital that enclosure played a constitutive role in the revolutionary transformation of feudalism into capitalism, both by transforming land from a means of subsistence into a means to realize profit on commodity markets (primarily wool in the English case), and by creating the conditions for the modern labour market by transforming small peasant proprietors and serfs into agricultural wage-labourers, whose opportunities to exit the market declined as the common lands were enclosed.
<u>Answer</u>:
You might see Frank Phillips working in a soup line as C: He strongly supported working to help in the community.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Frank Phillips was the President and Co-founder of “Phillips Petroleum Company”. He joined bond business with his father in law, John Gibson. He used to sell bonds in “Chicago” and “New England”.
One day he found an area, Oklahoma, rich in oil. Later, he and his brother started the oil business along with Gibson. Phillips Petroleum continued to grow manufacturing gasoline, aviation fuel etc.
Even during “Great depression” in U.S., he promised to help people and gave them jobs. He even made free circus available for the local school children and garnered a lot of appreciation for the same.
IM A PERSIAN LOL but like fr i needdapoints
