Answer:
D. to me the atom bomb seem not so bad.
Explanation:
if I am correct the video is "Duck and Cover"? I remember learning about this last year. The atom bomb was capable of extreme amounts of damage, so downplaying it for the kids and teaching them to 'duck and cover' in the form of a cartoon was the easiest way to help them learn safety procedures in case of an attack.
Risky behavior can lead to:
- decrease in self-esteem given all the aspects of risky behavior that a person may engage in. eg. drugs
-- emotional distress> use this definition to guide you to our answer : emotional distress - Legal Definition. n. A negative emotional reaction—which may include fear, anger, anxiety, and suffering—endured/experienced by the victim of a tort, for which monetary damages may be awarded.
- Internal anger :risky behaviour may lead to a build up of internal anger as in gives the persin engaging in this behaviour a sense of adrenaline and in some way may be emotionally addictive. If a person continues to engage in risky behaviour their violent instincts could become unleashed without them even realising it causing them to have a build up of anger within which in turn can most definitely effect their lifestyle choices.
- decrease in self esteem
- an addiction to it so when life is normal they'll feel grumpier, sad, angst, ect.
- loneliness
- apathy
Brazil is located on South Africa, so that is most likely the answer.
First Answer:
The socialism never found support among the people in United States due to small power of the workers Union. Also, companies have more political and financial power over their demands.
Second answer:
There could be more support for the homeless and poor people in big cities. Health care and some childhood protection against poverty might be another benefits from it.
Third answer:
The negative aspects we could imagine as the political power of unions increased among the workers. They would start attempting a coup across the country in order to start a social-communist regime. Another problem could be the increase in corruption, based on the good faith of the poor, that is, they could "buy votes" among the poor by threatening them with benefits' cut if the worker does not support them or does not vote for them.