Answer:
hen followed an angry altercation; heated passions led to bloodshed; in the tumult Remus ... The more common report is that Remus contemptuously jumped over the newly raised walls and was forthwith killed by the enraged Romulus, who ... The Roman State had now become so strong that it was a match for any of its
Explanation:
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer: They can declare laws or presidential actions unconstitutional.
Answer:
One of the most significant things that the colonies of Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire had in common was they were very anti-slavery.
Explanation:
The answer is A. Demoralizing the North with a victory on northern soil.
