Every time the Germans ran to the British and said Hail Hitler the British would simple say," Silly Germans you need to be Hailing Churchhill.
Dude this is a three to four paragraph essay you’ve been assigned, no, that’s not something someone just willingly does for free.
The correct answer is: Progressivism could best be described as a political ideology that assumes government exists in order to improve society. One of the main progressist ideas is that social and historical progress are unavoidable and human conditions is seen positively, as if it has improved and will keep up improving in future.
<em>seeks out new and better ways of managing government</em>. This option is wrong because the principal aim of progressivism is human perfectibility, which could be reach by scientific, moral and economics improvement, so progressist had faith and valued democracy and direct participation of the voters. In the book Progressive Democracy, Croly says, we believe “in the people to govern directly, without need of intermediary institutions”. As tyranny of minority and representatives were a big problem democracy was seen as the better way of managing government.
<em>stresses traditional approaches to issues in government</em>. This option is wrong because some progressist viewed the traditions and old ways of living, as well the classes system and the privileged aristocracy as a barrier for the progress, which then should pass through reforms.
<em>values individual freedom over government involvement</em>. Individual freedom is an absolute value in progressivism and many times the constitutional limits on government were seen as an obstacle for the human nature progress, however progressist saw that in some moments the government needs to interfere and regulates things, such as industries or railways to attend citizen’s needs.
Answer:
B. No written language
Explanation:
The very definition of prehistoric refers to the lack of written records or documents.
Prehistoric societies used tools and migrated often, and the understanding of science is too recent to be relevant for the question.
Despite the lack of a written language, we can learn about prehistoric society, precisely because of their tools and their migration patterns. Where to and when did they move? What kind of animals did they hunt? Their social structure and ideas of death, all that is there in their tools and remains. But without a written language, the knowledge we have is only approximate.
Answer:
woah woah woah what?? that question is straight up TOO FAR
Explanation:
