Which of these is a true statement?

History

2 answers:

kirza4 [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale Bible

Explanation:

The first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale BibleThe first publicly authorized bible to be read in England was the Tyndale Bible

kati45 [8]3 years ago

3 0

D is the answer your looking for

You might be interested in

Muscle tissues are made of specialized units called

maksim [4K]

Answer:

here is your answer

Genes

mark as brilliant and like pls

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many Irish immigrants settled in New York?

Leona [35]

It would be 650,000 so A

7 0

3 years ago

How do the three branches of<br>government sometimes work against<br>each other?

tresset_1 [31]

The branches work against eachother when it comes to laws. The legislative branch makes laws, but the President can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto. The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.

4 0

3 years ago

Who was Davey Crockett? How did he serve his country and Texas?

oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

David Crockett (August 17, 1786 – March 6, 1836) was an American folk hero, frontiersman, soldier, and politician. He is commonly referred to in popular culture by the epithet "King of the Wild Frontier".

He represented Tennessee in the U.S. House of Representatives and served in the Texas Revolution.

6 0

2 years ago

Why do you think the Republicans rejected negotiating a peace settlement in 1864 and instead demanded the unconditional surrende

algol [13]

It is first important to understand that not all Republicans rejected a peace settlement with the Confederates during or after the Civil War, but it was a smaller group within the party that totally and completely refused and demanded a full surrender without conditions to the South. This group was called the Radical Republicans and they began around 1854 and went until after the Reconstruction of 1877. They were the ones who were responsible for the establishment of the Fourteenth Ammendment and they radically opposed any negotiations with the South on the basis of their being totally against segregation and slavery. Some other factions within the Republican party, including Lincoln, were more moderate and were willing to give in to some of the demands from the Confederates, especially ont he issue of slaves.

The reason for these radical Republicans not wanting to negotiate with the Southern Confederates, was that they refused to allow slavery to continue. They were pushing for all slaves in the U.S to be freed, for segregation to be prohibited, for rights for black people to be established in the United States and even went as far as pushing for civil rights, including suffrage, for African Americans. But the South, of course, refused these terms. This is why neither Radical Republicans, nor Confederate members would have been able to settle anything in a negotiation. There was no common ground for the toughest issue of all; slavery.

8 0

3 years ago