Answer:
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into an alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder a la pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
¿Qué diferencias hay entre las corrientes que explican el origen de la humanidad Creacionista y Científicas?
Cuando hablamos de la perspectiva Creacionista, estamos hablando de un postulado religioso que indica que la creación del hombre proviene de la voluntad de Dios. Se basa en los textos de las llamadas sagradas escrituras o Biblia Cristiana. Esta óptica de la creación del hombre se plasma en el primer libro del Antiguo Testamento, llamado El Génesis.
La perspectiva Científica indica que el hombre es producto de una evolución natural de las especies. Una delas teorías científicas más reconocidas en este sentido es la Teoría de la Evolución de las Especies, del científico Charles Darwin.
Para la ciencia, el hombre es el producto de la evolución de miles y miles de años, hasta llegar a ser una creatura H*mo Erectus para finalmente convertirse en un H*mo Sapiens.
<span>D. Many of the natives quickly died from overwork and disease.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer for tis question is true, to this day there is not an specific fact on what happened that cause the deat of Glenn Miller.
Explanation:
However, through out the years there has been a few theories on the cause of the accident. One of them is that the enginee failed and as well another theory is that the pilot did not know how to manage the aircraft correctly.
Answer: oh oh, I know!
Du Bois attributed the intense opposition to the Bureau to what he referred to as the “American Assumption” that “wealth is mainly the result of its owner's effort and that any average worker can by thrift become a capitalist.”
BRAINLIEST would help very much :D
Explanation:
