There is no picture so I can’t help u
The capital of the Roman Empire was transferred by Constantine in 330 from Rome to Constantinople. Hence, Option B is correct.
<h3>Why Roman Empire transferred its capital?</h3>
Emperor Constantine the Great, in whose honor it was renamed, consecrated the ancient city of Byzantium on May 11, 330, and designated it to be the new capital of the Roman Empire in 324. The 'cradle of Orthodox Christian culture,' as Constantinople is known, is often regarded as being in the city.
Emperor Constantine believed that it would serve as the capital of the Roman Empire far more effectively than Rome itself because of its advantageous position. In order to pay tribute to the emperor who founded it as the empire's capital, the name of this city was changed to Constantinople.
As a result, the capital of the Roman Empire was transferred. Option B is correct.
Learn more about Roman Empire from here:
brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ2
<span>A budget that spends more money than the revenue coming in is known as a "deficit" budget, since in order to maintain such a budget there needs to be revenue coming from other sources. </span>
It is important not to concentrate too much power in one branch of government because then the laws will be practically unstable and inefficient. If there were too much power in the Executive Branch, people would be very accusatory and rights would be extremely limited. If the Legislative Branch had too much power, nobody would be able to truly define the laws and enforce them based on the definitions of the laws created. If the Judicial Branch had too much power, there probably wouldn’t be a lot of laws made or enforced, and controversy would be very high within the Courts. It would be necessary for one branch to exercise more power than another branch if the case defender and antagonist disagreed constantly. An example of this is Marbury v. Madison case, where the power of judicial review was exercised by the Judicial Branch to interpret who won the case (which in that case was James Madison). Another instance would be the Worcester v. Georgia case, where the power of interpretation was used to define the final decision that Cherokees were not obligated to follow Georgia’s laws.
